021103 |
Paph. wenshanense was introduced in the Newly
discovered Paphiopedilums NO. 39 already. I'll announce that
The species name of Paph. wenshanense has used
officially in RHS registration now. Here, Paph. wenshanense
means Paph. conco-bellatulum , as you know. Now,
I'm using Paph. conco-bellatulum in small letter
in stead of Paph. Conco-bellatulum by my personal argument.
We were talking about that using Paph. Conco-bellatulum
is not suitable for the species before. Especially, we have a
lot of problems for registration of it's hybrids. Because There
is no describe of Paph. conco-bellatulum as a species
in China. But we found and recognized the species name, Paph.
wenshanense to have been described from China instead
of Paph. conco-bellatulm. Once again, In truce, I have received the information about Paph. wenshanense from a friend of mine in Europe. So, I have sent the registration applications to RHS already. Yesterday, I have received the registration applications to have been accepted as follows. Paph. wenshanense x delenatii =
Amagiri You can register anytime...... We have similar problems about Paph. Greyi for Paph. x ang-thong, do you know ? |
|
|